Size:
4
Pay in installments of $7.46 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 1 - Jul 6
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
mermaid wedding dresses with sleeves and lace See Through Lace Rustic Wedding Dresses Long Sleeve Mermaid Wedding Dress AWD1165Vintage lace mermaid wedding dresses with sleeves and pearls around neckline. Note: To make sure sleeves fit perfectly, please give us your arm length, upper arm girth, arm hole, shoulder width, wrist size. Click here for measure guide. It can be made in other colors(Color Chart),please leave the color number in cart note or contact us. 1. Silhouette: Mermaid 2. Fabric: Lace 3. Embellishment: Beads 4. Neckline: V Neck 5. Sleeve: Long Sleeve 6.
- Vintage lace mermaid wedding dresses with sleeves and pearls around neckline.
- Note:To make sure sleeves fit perfectly, please give us your arm length, upper arm girth, arm hole, shoulder width, wrist size. Click here for measure guide.
- It can be made in other colors(Color Chart),please leave the color number in cart note or contact us.
-
1.Silhouette:Mermaid2.Fabric:Lace3.Embellishment: Beads4.Neckline: V Neck5.Sleeve:Long Sleeve6.Waistline: Natural7.Hem-length:Sweep train8.Back Details: Zipper9.Fully Lined: Yes10.Built-In Bra: Yes11.Boning: Yes12.Picture Color: Ivory Lace +Light Nude Lining (For other colors, please check our Color Chart)
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 2455 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Fits perfect
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Grey, Size: X-Large
This shirt is a perfect fit. I would buy it again in other colors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Comparable to high end mens shops!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Blue, Size: Large
Beautiful, heavy blue Oxford comparable to upper end mens store at 75% less! Full cut, great for casual wear or sending out for professional starching. Downside, no pocket, but I had mine monogramed wear the pocket would be and it looks like an expensive dress shirt. I bought more (with pockets) in blue & white
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Heavier fabric, very durable
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Grey, Size: Large
3 stars. Pretty nice shirt but the fabric is a bit firmer than i like. I iron it when i usually wear it so that it looks half decent since wrinkle resistance is low or poor. I usually have to use a higher setting on the fabric since the material is thick making it alot heavier. Overall great for the lower end cost, anything that beats it would probably be double the price. I work in a cubicle so this works well for me, a simple shirt, with a simple color.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
True to size, good quality, great value!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: White, Size: Medium
Great quality! Amazing thick material! Perfect basic button down shirt!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2025
★★★★★ 4
No Shirt Pocket!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Blue Stripe, Size: X-Large
No Pocket! The material was nice quality, a little thicker than I would have anticipate for a low priced shirt, and very soft. The only disappointment was there was not shirt pocket. I suppose I did not look closely enough at the photos to notice that before I purchased. Otherwise, this is a very comfortable shirt.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 23, 2026